Organic Food Debate

Organic foods have no unique health benefits, says a study out of London. But are there greater ethics involved? www.newsy.com


5 Responses to “Organic Food Debate”

  1. PRcanaveses says:

    I totally agree with the London study. I know that organic is good for the environment, but the growing of organic food is the least of our worries. There are many other things that we could be doing besides growing organic. Maybe we should look into those, instead of forking out $3 for a tomato.

  2. saramcoe says:

    Ugh, organic food is important! You may think that it is the least of our worries right now… but how do you justify that eating chemicals/pesticides/etc is not a worry?? Because you aren’t sick today?? Do you think that the trend of the rise of cancer is just a coincidence

  3. funkydrummer14 says:

    Have you always been anti-organic? What kind of statement is that? Does anyone even have a clue as to what the term organic means?! People talk about it like it’s some new food trend invented by a bunch of tree hugging hippies 20 years ago….It’s just REAL FOOD!! Hello! if you pick a berry in the middle of the woods, that’s ORGANIC, when our ancestors ate the meat from wild animals, it was ORGANIC!! Food without the added toxic crap, How anyone could be against that is beyond me!?!?

  4. strikenetter says:

    Organic= same product, costs more. From what i have gathered, pesticides are still used

  5. likepork says:

    Food is food. Really, I wouldn’t bother paying more for exactly the same shit.

Leave a Reply

This site uses CommentLuv and KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.CommentLuv Enabled

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.


Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Copyright ©2010 Natural Health Food